Pipeline Insight: Antiarrhythmics - RSD1235 in a class of its own
Pages: 160
Publisher: Datamonitor
Date Published: May 2006
Format: PDF
Price: $11400
Overview
Introduction
Datamonitor believes that RSD1235 (iv) has the potential to have a significant impact on the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In addition, P&G’s Stedicor and Sanofi-Aventis’ Multaq also offer advances on current treatments, with improvements in efficacy and safety therein.
Scope
Evaluation of patient potential for developmental antiarrhythmics over the period 2006-2015
Scrutiny of key impacts on the R&D approach and cost, evaluation of optimal clinical trial end points and identification of suitable comparators
Evaluation of key players in the arrhthymics market and opposing company approaches to development and commercialization
Analysis of key antiarrhymic drugs in development and their ability to satisfy major unmet needs and compete with existing agents
Report Highlights
2005 saw sales in the antiarrhythmics drug market decline. With key problems of current antiarrhythmic drug therapy surrounding their pro-arrhythmic and toxic side effects, it may be sufficient for developmental compounds to demonstrate equivalent efficacy but superior safety profiles to gain market share from the current genericized treatments.
By 2015 the global antiarrhythmic market will be worth $3.5 billion, with sales of pipeline products accounting for over two thirds of the market by this time. RSD1235 (iv) is predicted to command 27% of the whole market by 2015 on the back of good trial data and the involvement of Astellas in the promotion of the product in the US.
P&G Pharma’s Stedicor (azimilide) looks set to become the most successful orally active antiarrhythmic due to a combination of robust late-stage clinical trial data for Stedicor, particularly from the SHIELD (Shock Inhibition Evaluation with Azimilide) study, and lingering concerns over the relative safety of Sanofi-Aventis’ Multaq (dronedarone).
Reasons to Purchase
Explore physician attitudes to the newer antiarrhythmic drugs, and the threats faced by existing and developmental products
Predict future market leaders using our independent sales forecasts for products in late stage development in both existing and novel classes
Identify early stage antiarrhythmic compounds with high potential being developed by companies seeking a marketing partner
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Scope of the analysis
Historical perspective of the antiarrhythmics market
Size of the antiarrhythmics market in 2005
Datamonitor insight into the antiarrhythmic market
At the end of 2005, sales within the antiarrhythmics drug market were in decline. With the main problems of current antiarrhythmic drug therapy surrounding their pro-arrhythmic and toxic side effects, it may be sufficient for developmental compounds to demonstrate equivalent efficacy but superior safety profiles to gain market share from the current genericized treatments.
By 2015 the global antiarrhythmic market will be worth $3.5 billion, with sales of pipeline products accounting for over two thirds of the market by this time. Cardiome’s RSD1235 (intravenous formulation) is predicted to command 27% of the whole market by 2015 on the back of good safety and efficacy data, combined with the involvement of Japanese pharmaceutical giant, Astellas, in the sales and marketing of the product in the US.
Of the orally active antiarrhythmics currently vying for amiodarone’s crown, P&G Pharmaceuticals’ Stedicor (azimilide) looks set to win the battle with Sanofi-Aventis’ next generation antiarrhythmic Multaq (dronedarone), due to a combination of robust late-stage clinical trial data for Stedicor, particularly from the SHIELD (Shock Inhibition Evaluation with Azimilide) study, and lingering concerns over the relative safety of Multaq.
Summary
Key metrics
CHAPTER 2 PATIENT POTENTIAL
Normal heart electrical activity
What do we mean by the term arrhythmia?
Bradycardia
Tachycardia
Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs)
Ventricular tachycardias
Other arrhythmias originating in the atria
Premature supraventricular contraction or premature atrial contraction (PAC)
Other arrhythmias originating in the ventricle
Premature ventricular contraction (PVC)
Pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmia
Normal cardiac electrical activity vs irregularity
Non-nodal/fast response action potentials
Nodal/pacemaker action potentials
Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation
Future trends in the incidence and prevalence of AF
Methodology
Unmet needs in arrhythmia
Decreased mortality
Improved safety
Improved quality of life (QoL)
Improved treatment options for patients with underlying co-morbid conditions
Other unmet needs
The ideal anti-AF drug!
CHAPTER 3 PIPELINE OVERVIEW
Pipeline overview
Breakdown by development stage
Breakdown by company
Breakdown by mechanism
CHAPTER 4 R&D APPROACH
Principles of antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy
Classification of current antiarrhythmics
Class I antiarrhythmics
Class II antiarrhythmics
Class III antiarrhythmics
Class IV antiarrhythmics
Classification of pipeline products
Novel targets for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias
Potassium channel blockers
Sodium channel blockers
Adenosine A1 receptor agonists
Clinical trial design in arrhythmia
Comparator therapy
There is no single gold standard therapy
Chronic trials
In-hospital trials
Clinical trial endpoints in arrhythmia
Mortality rates
Efficacy
Chronic trials
In-hospital trials
Safety data
Cost efficacy
Patient numbers
Chronic trials
In-hospital trials
Trial length
Starting points
Patient selection
Hybrid therapy trials
CHAPTER 5 CLASS III ORAL ANTIARRHYTHMICS LATE-STAGE DRUG ANALYSIS & FORECASTS
Definition of current comparator therapies
Cordarone (amiodarone)
Indications
Side effects
Amiodarone’s efficacy
Conclusion
Multaq (dronedarone; SR-33589)
Drug overview
Clinical trial data
Datamonitor comments
Patient potential
Marketing factors
SWOT analysis of dronedarone
Performance against benchmark criteria
Forecasts to 2015
Stedicor (azimilide)
Drug overview
Clinical trial data
ASAP
ALIVE
SHIELD
Ongoing Trials
A-STAR (Azimilide supraventricular Tachyarrhythmia reduction)
A-COMET I and II (The azimilide cardioversion maintenance trials)
Patient potential
Azimilide in the ICD population
Azimilide in the AF population
Marketing factors
SWOT analysis
Performance against benchmark criteria
Forecast to 2015
CHAPTER 6 CLASS III INTRAVENOUS ANTIARRYHTHMIC LATE-STAGE DRUG ANALYSIS & FORECASTS
Definition of current comparator therapies
Corvert (ibutilide)
Conclusion
RSD1235 (intravenous formulation)
Drug overview
Development history
Clinical trial data
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Ongoing trials
Patient potential
Marketing Factors
Performance against benchmark criteria
SWOT analysis
Forecast to 2015
Pulzium (tedisamil)
Drug overview
Clinical trial data
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Patient potential
Marketing Factors
Performance against benchmark criteria
SWOT analysis: Tedisamil compared to Flecainide
Forecast to 2015
CHAPTER 7 ADENOSINE RECEPTOR AGONIST LATE-STAGE DRUG ANALYSIS & FORECASTS
Definition of current comparator therapies
Adenosine
Tecadenoson (CVT-510)
Drug overview
Clinical trial data
Phase III
Patient potential
Marketing factors
Performance against benchmark criteria
SWOT analysis
Forecast to 2015
CHAPTER 8 OTHER PIPELINE ANTIARRHYTHMICS
Phase II compounds
AVE-0118
Drug overview
Preclinical data
Phase II trials
AZD-7009
Drug overview
Phase I trials
Nibentan
Drug overview
Preclinical data
RSD1235 Oral
Drug overview
Phase I trials
Phase II trials
Selodenoson IV
Drug overview
Phase II trials
Preclinical data
Phase I trials
SSR-149744
Preclinical studies
Clinical trials
Phase I compounds
AVE-1231
PJ-875
Selodenoson (oral controlled release)
CHAPTER 9 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTIARRHYTHMIC PIPELINE
Comparative forecasts
Comparative analysis
APPENDIX A
Methodology
Datamonitor forecast methodology.
Epidemiology forecasts
Product forecasts
Datamonitor drug assessment summary
Contributing experts
References
Report methodology
APPENDIX B
About Datamonitor
About Datamonitor Healthcare
Datamonitor Healthcare’s therapy area capabilities
About the cardiovascular analysis team
Key therapy team members
Dr Allison Fleetwood, Director, Cardiovascular, Diabetes and Women’s Health
Dr Duncan Emerton, Senior Analyst, Cardiovascular (report contact)
Disclaimer


