Commercial Insight: Transplantation
Pages: 87
Publisher: Datamonitor
Date Published: June 2006
Format: PDF, Slide-Pack
Price: $15200
Overview
Introduction
In 2005, over 50.000 solid organ transplants were conducted in the seven major markets. In order to prevent the patient’s immune system from rejecting the transplanted organ, immunosuppression therapy is required for the lifetime of the graft with a base maintenance drug (either Calcineurin- or mTOR inhibitors) and adjunctive therapies (antimetabolites, steroids).
Scope
The report focuses on current and future therapies used for immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation, with sales and volume forecasts to 2015
Assessment of current and future dynamics, opportunities and threats for immunosuppressants across the seven major markets
Overview of organ supply, national donation rates, waiting lists and forecasts of the number of transplants and maintenance population to 2015
Assessment of key factors affecting prescription choice, including analysis of regional differences
Highlights
The transplantation market poses unusual challenges to pharmaceutical companies, the most significant one being a lack of donor organs: the waiting list for transplants will continue to grow faster than the number of available organs. Another challenge is the static nature of the market: maintenance regimens of stable patients rarely get changed.
The market for immusuppresssants used in transplantation is set to grow to $4.3 billion by 2015s. Despite changing protocols, the leading drug class by value should continue to be calcineurin inhibitors with a 37% market share, followed by mTOR inhibitors.
mTOR inhibitors are expected to be the fastest growing class, driven by Wyeth’s Rapamune. Datamonitor foresees the drug to gain a greater role as a primary immunsuppressant despite current tolerability issues. Bristol Myers Squibb’s injectable fusion protein belatacept may offer another alternative to calcineurin inhibitors
Reasons to Purchase
Identify and understand the dynamics in immunosuppressive protocols as reflected in opinion leaders’ thoughts
Quantify the future immunosuppressant market size by volume and value for each of the seven major markets
Quantify the future market size based on transplant types, numbers and the maintenance population
Table of Contents
About Datamonitor Healthcare
About the Respiratory and Infectious Disease team
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Scope
Datamonitor insight into the disease market
CHAPTER 2 MARKET OVERVIEW
Transplantation market valued at $3.3 billion
History of immunosuppression therapy
CHAPTER 3 MARKET ENVIRONMENT
Modest growth in the number of transplants
Uptake of novel maintenance therapies limited to de novo transplants
Low percentage of patients continue original regimens
The cost of non-adherence
Impact of pricing controls
CHAPTER 4 FORECAST ANALYSIS
Calcineurin inhibitors
No difference in long-term efficacy between Neoral and Prograf
Limited generic erosion of Prograf sales
Primary use of once-daily Prograf reformulation in de novo transplants
Slow uptake of generic cyclosporine maintains Neoral’s sales
mTOR inhibitors
Rapamune use expands in US
Certican US launch in early 2008
Adjunctive therapy
CellCept to remain dominant until patent expiry
Myfortic not sufficiently differentiated from CellCept
FK-778 demonstrates antiviral activity against polyoma virus
Induction therapy
Belatacept holds promise as alternative to calcineurin inhibitors
CHAPTER 5 SALES FORECASTS
Global forecasts
US forecasts
Japan forecasts
France forecasts
Germany forecasts
Italy forecasts
Spain forecasts
UK forecasts
CHAPTER 6 APPENDIX
Market definition
Forecasting assumptions and estimates
References
About Datamonitor
Disclaimer
List of Tables
Table 1: Global brand performance ($m), 2005-15
Table 2: Percentage of retail sales of tacrolimus, MMF, and cyclosporine in transplantation (%)
Table 3: Number of transplants by organ, seven major markets, 2000-05
Table 4: Transplants by organ, by country, 2005-15
Table 5: Continuation of original immunosuppressive discharge regimen in kidney patients transplanted in 2002, US
Table 6: Prograf generic erosion and pricing assumptions (%)
Table 7: Relative pricing of reformulations launched in the US
Table 8: Belatacept patient model
Table 9: Forecast sales, Global, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 10: Forecast sales, US, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 11: Forecast sales, Japan, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 12: Forecast sales, France, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 13: Forecast sales, Germany, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 14: Forecast sales, Italy, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 15: Forecast sales, Spain, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 16: Forecast sales, UK, 2005-15 ($m)
Table 17: Percentage of retail sales of tacrolimus, MMF, and cyclosporine in transplantation
List of Figures
Figure 1: Global sales performance by class ($m), 2005-15
Figure 2: Global brand performance ($m), 2005-15
Figure 3: Use of CellCept and Prograf, % kidney transplant patients prior to discharge, 1995 to 2004, US
Figure 4: Neoral and generic cyclosporine volume, 2001-2005, US
Figure 5: Continuation of original immunosuppressive discharge regimen in kidney patients transplanted in 2002, US
Figure 6: Generic erosion of Prograf and Neoral, US
Figure 7: Prograf and modified-release tacrolimus (FK-506MR4) sales ($m), 2005-15, global 45
